Amber edit the structure of human genetic 'necessary'

Science, ethics experts and a group of policy experts say Amber human genetic structure have permission to modify 'must' is, 

Hngstn group said in a report published in the early stages of research to changes in the genetic code 'very important' holds.It was also explained in this report with the currently GM's (the child who was genetically modified) must be allowed the birth. It is possible in the future under certain circumstances, such as births, morally recognized, to be taken.US aymbryuz amendments related genetic research funding is denied.World hngstn group meeting in genetic research is the amazing progress.The variety of unique technical procedures, molecular Set New 'at specific locations within our bodies' molecular Caesars' put through a cut in our DNA.What is the limit?

    The discussion began scientific experiments that will be the limit.
    Aymbryuz be made on any research to be banned? Research only to the extent permitted or allowed the children to GM?After researching several new dimensions that have emerged in this sector. A breakthrough in the research of genetic changes in children is not merely a possibility but is increasingly involved in possibilities.I heard earlier this year, China's yacht sen University said a team from an error in the DNA aymbryuz form may be far ahead in the early stages, the blood cause diseases Can.In the future this technology before birth aurkynsr causing cystic fibrosis in children who will be able to prevent cells.Several quarters of the investigation of this type demands are being made on the scientific experiments that started this debate will be the last. Aymbryuz be made on any research to be banned? Research only to the extent permitted or allowed the children to GM? 

      


Baasrhngstn group meeting in Manchester in which it was recognized that the pace of research in this field is moving ahead with its decision to increase the pressure 'has become. The meeting aymbryuz changes or amendments are allowed to be discussed.
The group released the statement that "we believe that this technology is very important in basic research and it would be more helpful going forward. But this technology is not worth it in the reproductive process in the human genome that can be used to change. "
US National Institutes of Health's position in this case is radically different from any of the genetic study of Amber already been banned.
The institute's director and leading figure in the Human Genome Project, Dr. Francis Cullen says aymbryuz inherent in the human DNA for medical purposes under the nqtah various amendments have been discussed for many years. And was felt globally as it is, they should not cross any case. 

However hngstn Group's report has recognized that the birth in humans morally acceptable way of using this technology can be. Although it needs to be discussed more sententious. "
The DNI this new technology in the most convenient way to change the basic data, there are doubts about.
Professor aymunyl sakpuntyy told the BBC that "personally I do not think the human genetic characteristics in a hereditary DNA has the right to modify, there are several generations passed away.
I then made changes in human DNA inherited object. "
Thks nufyld Council of Bio Dr. Peter Mills to discuss it further and said, "This technology and its use for some time, we heard the sound of footsteps. But now we have to decide what we are allowed to enter the time when it had reached the door to us. '