Apple's lawsuit in a US court after winning Samsung may have to sell some phones be barred.The decision regarding the suit filed in 2012, which ruled that Apple
had claimed that Samsung's nothing without his permission tynalujy is
using.If the trial judge was in 2014 when Apple announced a $ 12 million compensation was given. But Apple and Samsung appealed and asked them to stop selling the phones features that are controversial. If the judge does not agree with it, but this recent ruling that rejected the earlier decision.Samsung controversial features that Apple tried to stop selling the
phones did not work at first, because judges argued that if the company
did not prove that it has suffered enough.Re-examine the case of two of the three judges said that Apple
should have the right to ban sales of Samsung planted some phones.
Apple have won the round. But the fact that he could not slow Samsung
Professor Michael rash, ulanua University School of LawHowever, this does not mean that Samsung will be forced to stop selling phones with the disputed technology. This decision means that the case will now be in the lower district court, which will decide whether it is appropriate that a court order.It is not clear how this decision will have an impact on Samsung because it comes under the only Galaxy S 3 was launched in 2012 and now does not even appear in most markets. Also Samsung's software was updated and now features new models, there is a controversy.Ulanua University School of Law Professor Michael Resh says Apple have won the round. But the fact that Samsung could not slow down. "Samsung said that it can not decide to sell their main phones. It is also said that this decision is unfounded.He said in a statement that the high court has the right to appeal against this decision.Apple and Samsung patent on the technology have been several court battles. The two companies agreed in 2014 that he patented outside the US will withdraw all cases.
Apple have won the round. But the fact that he could not slow Samsung
Professor Michael rash, ulanua University School of LawHowever, this does not mean that Samsung will be forced to stop selling phones with the disputed technology. This decision means that the case will now be in the lower district court, which will decide whether it is appropriate that a court order.It is not clear how this decision will have an impact on Samsung because it comes under the only Galaxy S 3 was launched in 2012 and now does not even appear in most markets. Also Samsung's software was updated and now features new models, there is a controversy.Ulanua University School of Law Professor Michael Resh says Apple have won the round. But the fact that Samsung could not slow down. "Samsung said that it can not decide to sell their main phones. It is also said that this decision is unfounded.He said in a statement that the high court has the right to appeal against this decision.Apple and Samsung patent on the technology have been several court battles. The two companies agreed in 2014 that he patented outside the US will withdraw all cases.
No comments:
Post a Comment